Since this is my third child, I'm struggling with finding a creative way to commemorate this pregnancy. With the first, we had a photo session. The second, my mom and I created a belly cast. So why not do a nude photo shoot this time?! Wrong! Not ever going to happen.
But, it seems I'm in a minority with this thinking. Someone showed me a website for a metropolitan photographer who specializes in family and maternity photos. The picture contained partial frontal nudity for the woman and rear nudity for the man. Why?
I'm a firm believer in the beauty of pregnancy, but I'm still the same woman. If I won't take nude pics without a baby bump, why does the bump make it acceptable? The pictures I saw showed far more than the belly. When does nudity transcend from porn to art?
Rubies are rare and precious jewels. Every facet is unique. When they are broken, they can only be restored by the Creator.
5 comments:
Nude? I don't think so. But how about this? (some of these had me laughing)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1180359/Hows-belly-laugh-The-pregnant-women-decorate-bumps-amazing-artwork.html?ITO=1490
Karen,
I just took a peek at these. How cute! People are so creative! Perhaps I have some ideas.
Unfortunatley, our society has blurred that line far too much to tell anymore. I hope you find a good way to commemorate it and by the way CONGRATULATIONS! Sorry, I know I'm a little late.
I think nude is actually ok as long as it stays between you and Tre meaning he'd have to take the shots not a photograher. LOL you're beautiful sis but please don't post it. Of course then little Anton wouldn't have anything to look at years from now. Yes I jumped on the Anton bandwagon since I haven't come up with anything else yet.
Nah... no photos. My mind works great!
Post a Comment